032701274-3-26-2025-27-AS-KHOS-DFRRJW-20250415130438

Community Care Licensing

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 032701274
Report Date: 03/26/2025
Date Signed: 03/26/2025 01:50:34 PM

Unsubstantiated

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827

This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
02/03/2025 and conducted by Evaluator Arvin Villanueva

COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 27-AS-20250203170630

FACILITY NAME:	GOOD DAYS		FACILITY NUMBER:	032701274
ADMINISTRATOR:	SIX, ZULLY		FACILITY TYPE:	735
ADDRESS:	13511 BATES RD		TELEPHONE:	(209) 296-4699
CITY:	SUTTER CREEK	STATE: CA	ZIP CODE:	95685
CAPACITY:	4	CENSUS: 4	DATE:	03/26/2025
		UNANNOUNCED	TIME BEGAN:	12:45 PM
MET WITH:	Zully Six		TIME COMPLETED:	02:00 PM

ALLEGATION(S):

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Resident was forced to perform sexual acts with another resident against their will.
Facility staff did not prevent a resident in care from sexually abusing another resident in care.

INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

On 3/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a follow up complaint visit and deliver findings of the allegations noted above. LPA met with Zully Six, Administrator (AD) and stated the purpose of this visit. Residents were out in the community during this visit.

Allegation 1: Resident was forced to perform sexual acts with another resident against their will.
The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews of relevant individuals and record reviews of relevant documents.

Based on interview with Detective_1 (D1), D1 conducted the investigation on February 4, 2025, during which D1 interviewed both R1 and R2. Initially, R1 denied that any sexual activity occurred. However, D1 added that (F1) expressed their belief that the alleged sexual abuse did take place, though did not provide an explanation nor had any evidence to support this claim.
{1 of 4}

Unsubstantiated

Estimated Days of Completion:

SUPERVISORS NAME: Stephen Richardson
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Arvin Villanueva
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:	DATE: 03/26/2025

I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.

FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 03/26/2025

This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.

LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)

Page: 1 of 4

Control Number 27-AS-20250203170630

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827

FACILITY NAME: GOOD DAYS	FACILITY NUMBER: 032701274
	VISIT DATE: 03/26/2025

NARRATIVE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

D1 then stated that D1’s interview with R1 revealed that the sexual encounter was mutual. R2, when interviewed, initially denied any incident but later also described the encounter as consensual. D1 noted R2’s frustration during the interview. D1 ultimately concluded that there was insufficient evidence to continue the investigation, which lead D1 to end their investigation.

Through interview with R1, R1 stated that R1 was uncertain about the details of the alleged incident due to short-term memory loss. R1 neither confirmed nor denied the occurrence. Additionally, R1 reported feeling safe in the care home and described both Administrator, Zully Six (AD) and S1, as kind and supportive. Furthermore, R1 stated that neither S1 nor R2 had made inappropriate comments toward R1, nor had R2 engaged in any romantic or sexual behavior with R1.

Based on record reviews, multiple staff members (S2-S8) provided written statements indicating that they had never witnessed any inappropriate physical contact or interactions between R1 and R2. Several staff members noted that R1 and R2 frequently argued and had minimal interactions outside of these disagreements. Additionally, some staff members observed that R1 had a history of making inappropriate sexual comments and advances toward both clients and staff. Review of staff written statements also indicated that R1 had invited R2 into R1’s room on multiple occasions, but there was no confirmation that R2 accepted these invitations. One staff member (S6) reported that R1 had disclosed a consensual encounter with R2 but was concerned about R1’s ex finding out. Further, a handwritten statement from unnamed client detailed similar behavior by R1, indicating a pattern of initiating sexual interactions rather than being coerced into them.

Based on the information provided by law enforcement, staff, and R1, there is no preponderance of evidence to support the claim that R1 was forced to engage in sexual acts with R2 against their will. The investigation by D1 was closed due to lack of evidence, and multiple accounts suggest that R1 has previously engaged in and initiated consensual sexual discussions and behaviors. As a result, the allegation is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.

A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened the preponderance of evidence does not prove it.

{2 of 4}

SUPERVISORS NAME: Stephen Richardson
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Arvin Villanueva
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:	DATE: 03/26/2025

I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.

FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 03/26/2025

LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)

Page: 2 of 4

Control Number 27-AS-20250203170630

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827

FACILITY NAME: GOOD DAYS	FACILITY NUMBER: 032701274
	VISIT DATE: 03/26/2025

NARRATIVE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

Allegation 2: Facility staff did not prevent a resident in care from sexually abusing another resident in care.

The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews of relevant individuals and record reviews of relevant documents.

Through interview with D1, who investigated the allegation on February 4, 2025, interviews were conducted with both Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2), R1 initially denied that any sexual activities had occurred. According to D1, F1 expressed that F1 belief that the alleged abuse did take place but did not provide any explanation or supporting evidence to support the allegation. D1 further revealed that R1 stated that the sexual encounter was mutual. R2 initially denied any incident but later also described the encounter as consensual. D1 noted that R2 was frustrated throughout the interview and D1 determined that there was insufficient evidence to proceed with the investigation. As a result, the case was closed.

Interview with R1 indicated that R1 had short-term memory loss and was unsure of what had occurred. R1 expressed that R1 felt safe at the care home and stated that AD and S1, were supportive and understanding. R1 reported that neither S1 nor R2 had made inappropriate comments towards R1 and explicitly stated that R2 had not engaged in any romantic or sexual behavior towards R1. Additionally, R1 indicated that R1 had no mutual sexual encounters with R2 and did not find R2 attractive. R1 wished that the care home environment could return to how it was before the incident.

Record reviews showed that staff members (S2-S8) provided written statements where they collectively affirmed that they had never witnessed any physical contact or inappropriate interactions between R1 and R2. Staff members also noted that R1 and R2 frequently argued and had minimal interactions aside from these disagreements. Several statements indicated that R1 had a history of making inappropriate sexual comments and advances towards other residents and staff. Furthermore, written statements indicate that R1 had invited R2 into R1’s room on multiple occasions, but there was no confirmation that R2 accepted these invitations. A handwritten statement from another client (unnamed) detailed similar behavior by R1, suggesting a pattern of initiating sexual interactions rather than being coerced into them.

Additionally, there were no documented reports of staff witnessing any abuse or failing to act in response to potential concerns.

{3 of 4}

SUPERVISORS NAME: Stephen Richardson
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Arvin Villanueva
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:	DATE: 03/26/2025

I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.

FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 03/26/2025

LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)

Page: 3 of 4

Control Number 27-AS-20250203170630

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827

FACILITY NAME: GOOD DAYS	FACILITY NUMBER: 032701274
	VISIT DATE: 03/26/2025

NARRATIVE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

Given the evidence collected through law enforcement interviews, staff statements, and R1’s own accounts, there is no preponderance of evidence to clearly indicate that staff did not prevent a resident from sexually abusing another. The allegation is therefore determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.

A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened the preponderance of evidence does not prove it.

No deficiencies are being cited during today's visit.

Exit interview was conducted with Zully Six and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.

{4 of 4}

SUPERVISORS NAME: Stephen Richardson
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Arvin Villanueva
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:	DATE: 03/26/2025

I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.

FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 03/26/2025

LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)

Page: 4 of 4