1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 3/5/26 LPA Laird conducted interviews with three staff (S1-S3). Two staff interviewed stated they had knowledge of photos that had been taken of children. Staff stated the photos taken were shared between staff as a way to communicate and they were not shared outside of the staff message. All staff interviewed stated children are escorted to the bathroom and a staff will stand in the doorway and monitor children in the bathroom and in the classroom.
On 3/5/26 LPA Laird obtained evidence as part of this investigation.
Through interviews, staff spoke of two separate photos depicting children. Through observations and evidence obtained, LPA Laird did not observe any inappropriate images of children.
Based on evidence obtained as part of this investigation and staff interviews, LPA Laird determined there is sufficient evidence to suggest the allegations are valid. Although evidence obtained does not depict inappropriate images of children in care, the need for taking video or photos of children in care was unnecessary. In addition, based on staff interviews, there are instances when staff are tasked with watching both children in the restroom as well as children in the classroom and/or playground. Should staff need to respond to children in either area, the children in the opposite area would be left unsupervised.
Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility director, Julia Willette. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
|