1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Facility is retaining residents with open wounds.
During the interview process, the administrator and ten staff persons were interviewed. Resident 2 was not interviewed, as the resident is deaf and could not hear on the telephone. Documents were obtained to include the physician’s report, assisted living service agreement and home health notes. It was reported that Resident 2 has an open wound, which started as a cyst on the buttock. Home Health has been providing services to the resident, in which the resident was diagnosed with Carbuncles (infected hair follicles). It was reported that the resident’s physician is considering surgery. The resident has an ongoing skin condition and the resident is prone to having an open wound.
Resident 3 was not interviewed, as the resident resides in the memory care unit and has a hard time with communication. In addition, documents were obtained to include physician’s report, assisted living service agreement and home health notes. Resident 3 was diagnosed with a cutaneous abscess on the buttock, was prescribed antibiotics and is being treated by Home Health Services. Staff persons reported that the resident continually has itchy skin and scratches the abscess, which sometimes leaves it open.
Regarding both residents, the facility is allowed, to have residents with open wounds in that the regulations state the licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has a healing wound under the following circumstances: When care is performed by or under the supervision of an appropriately skilled professional. The wounds are not considered a stage 3 or a stage 4 pressure injury; therefore, the residents are allowed to reside in the facility.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that the Facility is retaining residents with open wounds. Although the residents may have an open wound, it has been determined that the complaint allegation is Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. |