1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | This Department reviewed two resident files and found both residents were incontinent. During staff interviews, staff stated due to resident behaviors and lack of training with those behaviors, residents did not have their briefs changed. This department reviewed the “reported care report” and “Observations” which were authored by staff submitted to CCLD by the facility. This department observed that R1 last received incontinent care on 12/19/21 at 9:21 PM. On 12/20/21 at 05:18 AM, MT documents, “(R1) SLEPT MOST OF THE NIGHT I TRIED TO HELP R1 CHANGE BUT NO LUCK, AM SHIFT WILL BE INFORM AND WILL TRY.” The next entry is on 12/20/21 at 1203 PM which states, “Resident has refused care all day, but this writer did manage to change Resident's bedding. MT will try to later change Resident's brief.” The subsequent 3 entries are similar. Its not documented until 12/21/21 at 2:17 PM that R1 was changed, “Resident's bedding was fully changed and socks, pants and briefs as well.” However, on 12/21/21 at 11:33 PM its documented, “Resident had refused to allow PM shift staff to provide care despite being visibly saturated in urine. During shift change Med Tech was able to change resident and RA was able to provide bedding change during that time as well.”
On the Recorded Care Chart for R2 (Resident 2) observed on 12/21/21 at 11:04PM, incontinence care was completed. Incontinence care does not show completed again until 12/22/21 at 2:31 PM. The reasons listed by staff for not having completed incontinence care state, “Resident refused attempt to provide care, Resident refused becoming agitated and aggressive, etc..”
Roseleaf Senior Care is a facility that primarily accepts residents with diagnosis related to memory care. Interviews revealed NOC shift only has one caregiver who is med tech trained on at a time. AM Staff reported they would often come in and find R1 and R2 saturated in urine. Only administrative staff were able to provide ways that they can redirect to provide incontinence care. Care giving staff reported they are not trained in providing incontinence care to combative residents although Executive Director provided demonstrations with R1.
Substantiated Based on the departments observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an Exit Interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed.
|