1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 5/6/26 and 5/12/26 LPA Laird conducted interviews with 7 witnesses (W1-W7). Of those interviewed, four witnesses stated they had observed children left unattended by daycare staff. Of those who had observed children unattended, none observed hazards present while children were unsupervised by daycare staff. All those interviewed stated licensee is in the home during daycare hours as well as at least one assistant.
On 3/18/26, 5/26/26, 6/1/126, and 6/2/26 interviews were conducted with 6 parents (P1-P6). Of those interviewed, two parents stated they have observed children unattended by daycare staff. Four parents interviewed stated staff are always present in the home with the children. Of those who observed children unattended, no one observed hazards present while children were left unsupervised.
On 3/18/26 and 5/6/26 interviews were conducted with 3 staff (S2-S4). Of those interviewed, all staff stated children are left unattended by daycare staff sometimes. All staff confirmed licensee is present in the home during daycare hours and there are always assistants present in the home.
Based on interviews LPA Laird determined there is not sufficient evidence at this time to determine if lack of supervision has resulted in inappropriate interactions between children in care. Although children are left unattended at times, LPA Laird did not find that the licensee or staff violated Title 22 regulations pertaining to supervision for Family Child Care Homes.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee, Heather Ives. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
|