1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Six staff members were interviewed on 8/7/25. Staff were interviewed from both infant room (S1-S2) and preschool room (S3-S6) and all knew C1 had been injured after it was reported to the facility. All staff stated they were informed that C1 had been taken to a physician three times but only one time did C1 exhibit signs of injury while in care. All staff from the infant room witnessed C1 behaving as if injured after waking from a nap during that single incident. None of the preschool staff stated they had recognized C1 display signs of injury while in care. On the first and third occasion, staff indicated that C1 was playing and behaving normally. At pick up the preschool staff indicated that C1 was crying over an alteration with a friend, but they did not see any signs that C1 was in pain.
Five parents were interviewed on 10/17/25 and 10/22/25. Two parents (P1 & P3) have not encountered any situations where their child had been injured, nor had they received any injury reports. Two parents (P2 & P4) stated their child had been injured and the facility had communicated the incidents. One parent, (P5) stated their child had been injured at the facility and the facility failed to report it.
LPA reviewed C1’s file including a physician’s report, health history and a physician’s exam. LPA received copies of injury reports for C1 dated 4/21/25-7/23/25 signed by C1’s parents which documented various incidents and injuries while child was in care. Documentation indicated C1 was in good health and the facility was consistently reporting incidents/injuries that were witnessed by staff while C1 was at the facility.
Based on staff interviews it is unclear how C1’s injuries occurred. Staff documented injuries they witnessed. Parent interviews indicated that there were inconsistencies with documentation of other children in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee Lacey Tweedt. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |