1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on reviewed facility paperwork, interviews with staff, reporting party, and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if staff did not meet the resident's toileting care needs, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Staff did not provide proper supervision to resident in care- LPA Lund reviewed facility paperwork, interviewed reporting party, staff, and witness. Based on reviewed facility paperwork, interviews with staff, reporting party, and witness. LPA Lund reviewed hourly bathroom charts for Resident (R1) from 2/5/2026 from 5/26/2026 which states that staff did hourly checks on R1. Staff interviewed stated that they would do hourly checks on R1. Reporting Party and witness stated that the facility is providing supervision to R1.
Based on reviewed facility paperwork, interviews with staff, reporting party, and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if staff did not provide proper supervision to resident in care, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Staff did not provide proper food service to resident in care- LPA Lund reviewed facility paperwork, interviewed reporting party, staff, and witness. Based on reviewed facility paperwork, interviews with staff, reporting party, and witness. LPA Lund reviewed meal tracking form from 4/2/2026 through 5/25/2026 for Resident (R1) which would state if R1 would eat or not. Reporting Party and witness stated that R1 needs including meals are being met from the facility.
Based on reviewed facility paperwork, interviews with staff, reporting party, and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if staff did not provide proper food service to resident in care, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
As a result of this investigation, this Department finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and report left.
|