1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted throughout the investigation, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) did not obtain sufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff left a child unsupervised while in care. Interviews conducted with staff indicated that children were supervised at all times, and staff described active supervision practices, including positioning themselves to maintain visual contact with children.
LPAs reviewed available information related to the incident and did not observe any indication that the child was left alone without supervision. Additionally, there were no corroborating statements from staff or other witnesses to support the allegation. Although an incident involving a child was discussed, the information obtained did not demonstrate that a lapse in supervision occurred.
It was determined that this allegation may or may not have occurred. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No Deficiency has been cited for this allegation.
Exit interview was conducted with Director Michelle Grant and appeal rights were provided.
A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND MUST BE POSTED FOR 30 CONSECUTIVE DAYS. |