1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA reviewed the email notice to vacate sent to the facility by R1's son (W2)/POA. The email confirmed that R1's POA issued a written notice to the facility that R1 is moving out of the facility.
LPA reviewed five different POAs and obtained the following information:
- On 3/3/2024, W1 was designated as R1's POA
- On 4/24/2024, W2 was designated as R1's POA
- On 8/28/2024, W2's designation as POA was revoked; no POA was designated
- On 9/3/2024, W2 was designated as R1's POA
- On 9/13/2024, W2's designation as POA was revoked
R1 was officially discharged from the facility on 9/9/2024.
Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the above allegation is unsubstantiated.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
There is no deficiency noted for this visit. |