1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LIC9099-C
Allegation: Staff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund.
Investigation Finding: Substantiated
During investigation, LPA interviewed (Staff 1) S1 who stated that the resident (R1) was first admitted at the facility on 02/06/23. S1 confirmed with LPA that R1 paid $6,000 1st month rent on 02/06/23, $6,000 last month rent on 02/14/23 and $2,000 security deposit for damages on 03/06/23. S1 stated that per S2, the security deposit was for damages due to the resident urinating on the hardwood floors in their bedroom and facility. R1 moved out the facility on 04/01/24. Per RP, R1 should have a refund of $9,380.82. The calculations is prorated from April 2nd through April 8th, 2024 which is $1,380.82. S1 stated that they will pay the refund back to R1.
Based on the department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation that facility did not issue a refund according to the resident's admission agreement was found to be substantiated.
Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. |