1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in dehydration
Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation, the department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible party and reviewed resident (R1) documents. LPA interviewed staff (S2, S3) who stated that R1 was independent with his daily meals and was observed to eat and drink water & juice during mealtimes (3X per day) and offered drinks with snacks at 10AM and 2:30PM daily. They stated they offered him drinks frequently but sometimes he refused since he did not feel thirsty. Based on records review, interviews conducted, and observations made, the department has investigated the above allegation that staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in dehydration and found it to be unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in dehydration is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Staff did not communicate with resident’s responsible party
Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation, the department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible parties and reviewed resident (R1) documents. LPA interviewed staff (S2) who stated that they communicated with R1’s responsible party (POA) regarding R1’s behaviors (being quiet, wandering with coat under arm wanting to go home, un-witnessed fall and ER hospital visit on 11/29/24. Based on records review, interviews conducted, and observations made, the department has investigated the above allegation that staff did not communicate with resident’s responsible party and found it to be unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not communicate with resident’s responsible party is unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided. |