1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ...Continued from LIC 9099
When asked, S1 said that they were unaware that there were any missing screens. LPA also observed that some of the screens that were there, had holes and were in disrepair.
On the allegation: Staff did not sanitize after body fluids was found in common areas. Based on observations and interviews on 7/7/2025 staff were informed that the courtyard smelled of urine. On 7/18/2025 staff were informed that feces was found in the courtyard, on 7/19/2025 the feces was still in the courtyard accessible to residents.
On the allegation: Facility is locking memory care outdoor space. Based on observations and interviews, the memory care door is locked from the inside at all times. The memory care courtyard is accessible from the resident rooms that are along the perimeter of the courtyard, and through a door in the memory care hallway. The hallway door is able to open from the outside to enter into the hall but is locked for those attempting to go out into the courtyard. LPA observed a stick being placed on the ground in the doorway to keep the door open.
Based on LPAs interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
|