1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUE FROM LIC9099
C1 had gotten into the office and was on the floor, S1 stated that S1 pulled C1 out of the office on a blanket and staff closed the door of the office once C1 was removed. Interview with S2 revealed that C1 was on the floor in the office and witnessed S1 grab C1 by the ankles and pulled C1 out of the office by C1’s ankles on C1’s bare buttock. Interview with S3 revealed that S1 had C1 by the ankles pulling C1 on C1’s bare buttocks on the floor down the hallway. C1 had gotten into the office and was on the floor, S1 stated that S1 pulled C1 out of the office on a blanket and staff closed the door of the office once C1 was removed. Interview with S2 revealed that C1 was on the floor in the office and witnessed S1 grab C1 by the ankles and pulled C1 out of the office by C1’s ankles on C1’s bare buttock. Interview with S3 revealed that S1 had C1 by the ankles pulling C1 on C1’s bare buttocks on the floor down the hallway.
Based on LPAs observations, interviews conducted, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulation, Title 22 is cited on the LIC 9099D.
An exit interview conducted, and a copy of appeal rights left and discussed with the Administrator. |