1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continue from LIC 9099
Staff then witnessed C1 walk up to S1 and vomited in S1 face. S1 stated that S1 stood up and wiped S1 eyes and S3 helped S1 to the bathroom. S3 stated that when C1 vomited in S1 face S1 stood up and was wiping S1 eyes and S1 hand touched C1 and it may have been S1 reflexes, S3 stated that S3 helped S1 to the door leading to the hallway, S3 remained in the room with C1. Staff stated that S4 was sitting next to the door on the phone (FaceTime). S4 stated that C1 vomited in S1 face and S1 stood up wiped the vomit from S1 eyes and then slapped C1 and asked why did you do that. S4 also stated after the incident that S4 called the Administrator to report the incident. S2 stated that S2 was in the restroom at the time of the incident and saw S1 cleaning up and asked what happened, at that time S1 reported that C1 vomited in S1 face while trying to keep C1 calm in C1 room. S4 reported the incident to S2 and informed S2 that S1 slapped C1 in the face.
Based on LPAs observations, interviews conducted, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulation, Title 22 is cited on the LIC 9099D.
An exit interview conducted, and a copy of appeal rights left and discussed with the Administrator. |