1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On the allegations that staff were not feeding residents, staff are not ensuring the residents are consuming an appropriate amount of fluids, Staff are allowing the residents to eat food with ants, and Staff do not prevent a resident from attacking other residents, the following was found:
There was no documentation to support that residents were denied meals. Staff and supervisory interviews confirmed that feeding support is provided only with physician orders. Interviews with residents produced that all residents were satisfied with their food service. The kitchen was also observed fully stocked. Memory Care Director confirmed that staff had previously fed residents on the first floor, but that practice ended unless feeding orders were in place. On the allegation that staff were not ensuring adequate hydration in-service training focused on hydration was conducted on 12/12/24. Memory Care Director stated that “after the in-service, hydration improved,” however prior to in service training there was not documented incidents were residents were not consuming enough fluids. The facility did experience an ant infestation in the summer of 2024, but extermination services were called, and the issue was addressed. LPA previously had obtained extermination records and observed the facility to be free of ants. There was no evidence presented that residents consumed food with ants. While ants were documented in some resident rooms, neither interviews nor facility records confirmed that food contamination occurred. The allegation that staff failed to prevent resident-to-resident aggression could not be substantiated. LPA reviewed incident logs, internal reports, and conducted interviews with staff and residents. No documentation or statements supported that any physical aggression between residents occurred during the investigation window. Staff where able to identify de-escalation techniques when asked.
Based on the information obtained, the above allegations are unsubstantiated.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED
|