1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 02/13/26 4:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent complaint visit to amend the investigation findings delivered on 02/03/26. LPA obtained the original complaint investigation findings delivered on 02/03/26 from ADM during visit. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with administrator (ADM) and delivered new investigation findings.
Allegation: Licensee allowed uncleared adult to provide care and supervision to residents in care
Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation LPA interviewed licensee (LC), staff (ADM1, ADM2, ADM3, S1, S2), client (C1) and reviewed staff documents. Review of employee roster in Guardian Portal dated 01/30/26 showed all staff (ADM1, ADM2, ADM3, S1, S2) were fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility prior to employment. On unannounced visits at the facility on 07/25/25, 08/14/25, 1/23/26 and 01/30/26, LPA observed all staff working at the facility were fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation: Licensee did not ensure that staff were adequately trained
Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation LPA interviewed licensee (LC), staff (ADM1, ADM2, ADM3, S1, S2), client (C1) and reviewed staff documents. Review of administrators’ records showed ADM1, ADM2, ADM3 completed their Adult Residential Facility (ARF) Administrator Certification Programs with current Standard Certificates. LPA reviewed documents which showed each staff completed over 20 hours of continuous education, passed the 35-hour Direct Support Professional training classes certifications (DSP1 & DSP2), behavior redirection, documentation, client safety & first aid and crisis management as required by Regional Center of the East Bay (RCEB). Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
|