1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | pg 3
S1 stated that they estimate that R1’s diapers are changed about 12-18 times a day, but that staff relies on R1 to tell staff when they need to be changed, and that staff do not proactively check on R1. S1 admitted that there could be delays stating “Sometimes we(staff) are busy with other residents so there might be a delay, but we(staff) eventually get to R1.” S1 confirmed that staff were aware of R1’s need for frequent diaper changes.
In the interview with S2 they denied being informed of delays in R1 being changed and the fact that R1 had pressure injuries. However, when S2 was presented with documentation of R1’s notes detailing the instructions for R1 from the wound care they stated that, “This should have not happened if proper care was provided” S2 also denied knowing of the notes left for R1’s pressure injuries
S3, S4, and S5 all had similar account when it came to the frequency of changing R1 stating that they are changed on average 10 times a day but did wait for R1 to request being changed. Staff also all alluded to R1 “requiring a lot of attention” and that they were not always able to assist immediately.
Based on the interviews, medical records, wound care notes and photos it was found that delays in providing incontinence care directly contributed to the progression of R1’s pressure injuries. While staff claimed to respond “eventually” the lack of proactive care and reliance on R1 to request assistance demonstrates systemic neglect. The facility failed to ensure adequate staffing or adherence to care instructions, resulting in preventable harm to R1. Therefore, the allegations of Staff not changing residents in timely manner, Staff neglecting resident resulting in pressure injuries, and Staff not responding to resident calling for help in a timely manner are Substantiated.
Report Continues on LIC9099-C |