1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff did not prevent a resident from harassing another resident.
Based on interviews, record review, and observation, R3 expressed concerns regarding another resident eating in the facility’s designated dining area. Title 22 provides residents with the right to utilize the facility’s designated dining area. The other residents’ presence and use of the dining area did not constitute harassment. Residents cannot dictate where other residents exercise the right to dine within the facility or characterize the exercise of that right as harassment. Staff were not identified as failing to intervene in any conduct that constituted harassment. Therefore, this allegation is UNFOUNDED.
Staff restrained a resident.
Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, there was no evidence that staff physically restrained R3, restricted R3’s freedom of movement, or prevented R3 from leaving against R3’s will. R3 stated that R3 was able to disengage from the encounter and leave when R3 chose to do so. Therefore, this allegation is UNFOUNDED.
Staff accessed resident's apartment without permission.
Based on interviews, record review, and observation, R3 stated that staff do not enter R3’s apartment except on scheduled cleaning days. R3 identified Wednesdays as the scheduled cleaning day and stated that staff enter the apartment with R3’s permission to provide cleaning services. There was no evidence that staff entered R3’s apartment outside of scheduled cleaning services or without R3’s permission. Therefore, this allegation is UNFOUNDED.
Exit interview conducted. Report left with facility. |