1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff explained that on 09/17/2025, during outdoor play in the toddler area, two children were playing in a foot-powered toy car when it tipped over. Staff observed the incident, responded immediately, provided first aid, and completed an incident report. Interviews with staff reflected that they were attentive and acted quickly. Several parents also shared that the facility generally communicates openly about incidents through phone calls, written reports, in-person conversations, and the center’s app.
However, the investigation revealed some inconsistencies. Statements did not consistently confirm that the parent of the injured child received timely notification or documentation. The incident report reviewed by LPA did not include the parent’s signature, so there was no documented confirmation that the parent was informed. Additionally, there was a delay in reporting the incident to Child Care Licensing. Records indicate the facility contacted the Officer of the Day on 09/23/2025, six days after the incident.
While staff appeared to respond appropriately to the incident and made efforts to communicate, the combination of inconsistent statements, lack of signed documentation, and the delay in reporting to Licensing made it difficult to confirm whether the parent was properly notified.
This agency determined that the complaint is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted with Director Erin Ortiz, during which this report was reviewed in full. A copy of the report, Appeal Rights, and a Notice of Site Visit were provided and discussed. |