1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA was unable to tour R1’s apartment due to R1 no longer being in the facility. LPA viewed apartments belonging to other residents in the facility and did not observe the apartment rooms to be dirty, LPA observed hand soap, and resident TV’s to be in working order. Interviews with staff revealed that staff were trained on how to meet R1’s hygiene needs, however, R1 would refuse. Interviews with the Administrator revealed that resident families provide resident bedding and hand soap. Staff interviews revealed that staff will contact residents’ families when a resident is low on a specific item. Interviews with staff also revealed that soiled bedding is immediately washed, and some residents are provided with one set of bedding. The facility does have “loaner bedding” for a resident if it is needed.
Based on observation and record review, the allegations: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings, Resident's room is dirty, Staff did not provided resident with adequate bedding, Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs, Resident's bathroom has no hand soap, and Resident's TV is in disrepair are UNSUBSTABTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
No deficiencies issued during this inspection.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. |