1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigator Bennett interviewed adult (A1) on 4/24/25 and stated they would visit licensee’s home but was not involved with the daycare and denied being left alone with any of the children and denied ever inappropriately touching a daycare child.
Investigator Bennett interviewed adult (A2) on 4/24/25 and denied any knowledge of A1 being left alone with daycare children.
Investigator Bennett obtained and reviewed reports pertaining to the allegation. (C1) was interviewed on 3/10/25 and confirmed the allegation.
Investigator Bennet interviewed 3 additional daycare children (C2-C4) on 4/24/25, none of the children in care stated to have witnessed or have any knowledge of the allegation.
During today’s inspection, the facility was toured.LPA observed 5 children in care.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee Mariana Quezada. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
|