1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During medication administration record (MAR) review LPA Strong observed Resident 1’s (R1) medication prescription for Medication 1 (M1) prescribed as 90mg tab, 1 every 6 hours. M1 was documented only as a PM medication and there were no other entries for M1. MAR also shows that S1 signed MAR for M1 as received though the matching note states “no medication available”. Additionally, medication 2 (M2) was also signed as received though matching note states “no medication available”.
It was also alleged that residents have not been issued medication as prescribed. During medication review, LPA Strong observed MAR for R1 showing that R1 did not receive a M1 and M2 as prescribed because it was “not available”. Interview with staff corroborated that medication is often not filled timely and residents do not receive medication as prescribed when medication is not available.
Additionally, it was alleged that staff alter prescription medication bottles with their own handwriting. During medication review, LPA Strong observed R1’s medication 3 (M3) with handwriting stating “cut in half”. M3 prescription states 2.5 mg tab 1 tablet by mouth 2x daily, with no instruction to cut in half by pharmacist or physician.
Based on interviews and observations, a preponderance of evidence exists to support the allegation that staff did not keep an accurate medication log, staff did not issue residents medications are prescribed, and staff altered medication label. The allegation is therefore substantiated. A deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Administrator Ana Garcia Parra Diaz, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 9099-C, LIC 9099-D, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to. |