1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | and submitted SIR to notify agencies of assault and what agency was doing to protect child. Interviews conducted with children stated that facility staff will report runaway status by calling law enforcement. Two (2) children stated that staff will shadow them when leaving and try to redirect them to come back.
It was also alleged, staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in child frequently running away. Administrator and staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that they will verbally redirect children not to leave and warn children of the dangers of running away. Staff stated they will shadow children still trying to verbally redirect them until children run off and are out of sight. Staff identified having adequate staffing to meet the needs of children but that some children just leave anyway even though staff redirect. Staff stated the child in which this investigation involved frequently ran away from facility and that child was talked to regularly. Staff stated that social workers were notified of behaviors and that staff were trying to do all they could to monitor child. Interviews conducted with children stated that staff will redirect them and that their is enough staff to monitor them throughout the day.
Lastly it was alleged, staff are not ensuring that a minor receives mental health services. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that children meet with therapist regularly unless they refuse. Children stated they meet with the house therapist once a week or regularly as part of their plan. Interview conducted with one witness identified having difficulty working with children based on facility not being in facility or scheduling outings during scheduled therapy times. However, LPA was unable to identify any supportive documents to corroborate statement made by witness.
LPA attempted to contact county social workers and additional witnesses regarding allegations, however, documents reviewed identified that agencies had no concerns with children being placed in the home or care being provided by facility. Additionally, documents showed that staff did report incidents to all required agencies and followed procedures and policies. Reviewed staff roster showed adequate staffing to care for the clients in care.
Based on information gathered, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation was not met, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report Confidential Names Form, and Appeal Rights were provided to the Administrator. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection.
|