1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Through the course of the investigation, starting from 02/16/21 through 06/30/21, LPA interviewed Licensee, four adults, eight parents, and attempted to interview three children. Some children were not verbal, too young to interview, not available, or did not qualify to be interviewed. Two adults (A1, A3) and one child (C3) did report observing L smoking marijuana in a separate shed located near the home and one parent (P3) heard of L smoking marijuana, however, other statements provided by two adults and eight parents did not report any corroborating evidence of L smoking in the facility or being impaired while children were in care. Parent statements further noted that their children were happy or excited to go to the facility and did not appear to be fearful or withdrawn from L or other staff. Parent statements did not reveal any negative experiences regarding L’s ability to provide care and supervision. As such, there is not enough evidence to corroborate that L is impaired while children were in care or that it affected the care and supervision provided to the children.
Based on the investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there’s not a preponderance of evidence to support the allegation that the Licensee was impaired while children were in care and therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. This report was discussed and reviewed with L and an Exit interview was conducted with L. L’s signature was not recorded on this Complaint Investigation Report (CIR), however; L was provided with a copy of this report, and L’s confirmation of read receipt is on file. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days. There were no title 22 deficiencies cited during this visit. Appeal Rights were provided. |