1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not surrender resident’s cash resources to resident upon eviction. It is alleged facility is client's payee, therefore social security (SSI) money is currently going directly to them leaving client without money for basic needs. Interview with C1 revealed, C1 has not been able to obtain funds as SSI has not change payee. Interview with administrator revealed, the facility follows SSI policy of returning the money directly to SSI once a client has left or is no longer at the facility. Per facility’s social worker after the client was evicted on 5/31/23, social worker assisted C1 with paying for a hotel room and other expenses through the month of June with C1’s SSI money as money was send to the facility. C1 and social worker went to SSI office in person to request update of payee to self. On 5/31/23 C1 was evicted an investigation was conducted on 7/13/23 regarding eviction on complaint # 28-AS-20230707111110. Document review revealed a check stub/invoice was signed by C1, which notes the sum of a total of $1550,(board and care for the amount of 1324.82 and personal and incidental (P&I) money for $225.63) were distributed to C1 and signed by C1 on 6/12/23. Record of Client's Safeguarded Cash Resources notes a balance of 225.63 for 6/1/23, C1 signed received on 6/1/23. On 8/18/23, An analysis of funds for June 2023 was provided. This analysis notes expenses on personal items at stores, food purchases, and motel payments for 5/31-6/9 and 6/19-6/26 for a total of $1775.63. Facility’s accounting department received direct deposit from SSI for C1 on 7/3/23 and 8/3/23. Accounting department send check #13949 dated 7/27/23 including a note that C1 is no longer the payee and check #14045 dated 8/4/23 to SSI returning C1’s money. Per documents review the facility follow steps to ensure C1’s money was return to SSI.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted with Katrin Silvestro Social Worker and a copy of this report was provided. |