1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, staff harass resident(s) in care. It’s being alleged the Administrator initiates an argument with a client so that the client will react and hit the Administrator. Two clients out of six clients stated they have witnessed arguments between a client and the Administrator. Four clients out of the six clients stated they did not witness this type of incident. S2 stated they had not witnessed this behavior. The Administrator denied the allegation.
Regarding the allegation staff threaten resident(s) in care. It’s being alleged a client feels threatened by the Administrator. The six clients interviewed stated they do not feel threatened by the Administrator. S2 stated they had not witnessed this behavior. The Administrator denied the allegation.
Regarding the allegation Staff do not ensure that resident(s) are administered their medication(s) as prescribed. It’s being alleged the Administrator frequently distributes the clients’ medications at a late time during the evening hours. Five clients out of the six clients stated the Administrator distributes the medications after dinner and never distributes the medications later in the evening. C1 stated the late medication distribution did occur. LPA Spaeth observed the six clients’ medication logs. The logs revealed the clients received their daily medications at the prescribed times. S1 and S2 stated the six clients have never stated they did not receive their medications as prescribed. S2 stated they have never distributed clients’ medications at a late time during the evening hours.
Based on the record review and interviews of the clients and the staff member, the allegations are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was given.
|