1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
In regards to the allegation: “Staff handled client in a rough manner.” It is alleged that a facility staff member grabbed C1’s right arm and turned C1 to ask why she was crying and whining. It is also alleged that C1 had a soft growth on her arm upon checking. (4) out of (4) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Interviewed staff stated that all the clients are treated with respect. Some staff interviewed indicated that they have seen lumps on C1's hands and left arm, but these are not a result of being mishandled. S3 denied the allegation and stated that on 12/09/2024, while in the vehicle heading to the day program, C1 was making a crying and whining noise because C1 was feeling cold, but no tears were visible on her face. Upon exiting the vehicle, S3 stated that she did not grab C1’s right arm, but rather assisted in taking off C1's backpack and helped zipped up her jacket and instructed C1 to stand in the sunlight to get warm. C1 stated that she could not remember the incident and refused to talk about it. C1 indicated that she has always had the lump on her left arm and hands for quite some time now and it is not painful. C1 stated that she is happy and feels safe in the facility. Interviews conducted with C2-C4 revealed that staff have never handled them in a rough manner, they are satisfied with the services and do not have any concerns. W1 stated that C1 was dismissed from the day program on 01/02/2025 due to C1's outburst and the potential for making false accusations, as confirmed by W2. Documents reviewed by LPA revealed that C1’s notes between Oct. 2024 – Nov. 2024 demonstrated a behavior in which C1 pretended to cry, often make loud cry noises, and wipe her eyes (no tears) numerous times. Review of S3’s personnel records indicated that she has completed the necessary training and there are no documented incidents of injuries to C1 or other clients resulting from S3 handling clients in a rough manner. During the visit, LPA observed interactions between staff and clients and did not observe anything of concern. Based on documentation reviewed and interviews conducted, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview and a copy of this report was provided to Rose Grant, Direct Support Professional. |