1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Cont from 9099)
time of visits for an interview. Interview with two (2) of two (2) staff reveal R1 was a previously conserved resident. Staff #2 (S2) also revealed did not receive the conservatorship termination information until 03/18/2023 by R1 and R1s check was taken to the bank on 03/15/2024. S2 admitted to failing to closely inspect the check for correct recipient and deposited the check according to conserved protocols for the facility. Staff revealed due to scheduling a conflict on 03/15/24, R1 did not receive the funds until 03/20/24. LPA Smith reviewed Record of clients safeguarded cash resources and observed that R1 received payment on 03/20/24 and conservatorship termination letter dated 03/20/24 is in file. Two (2) of two (2) staff deny any malicious intent to financially abuse R1 and returned funds promptly.
Based interviews and record review although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Staff did not ensure that resident received their mail
It was alleged that staff did not ensure that resident received their mail. Interview with two (2) of two (2) staff revealed that the mail is held at a central point to prevent any lost or stolen mail. Then office staff sort and distribute mail to the residents. Interview with seven (7) out of seven (7) residents reveal they receive their mail and have not had and issue with receiving their mail that comes to the facility.
Based interview and record review although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Exit interview conducted/copy of report given.
|