1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | When the technician came out, it was determined that the signal to receive internet services was weak in room #62 and not that the phone jack was non-operational. Per Administrator, the technician said that they can install a phone line in the room so it was not in disrepair. After he was informed that the signal for internet was weak in room #62, he offered to move Resident #1 to another room with better signal. R1 agreed and moved to the other room on 4/30/21. LPA received a copy of the AT&T billing invoice for 4/10/21 that the tech support service was requested between 3/16/21 - 4/24/21. LPA interviewed the maintenance staff who stated that room #62 was checked for any wiring issues once it was reported that the phone jack was not working in April 2021. Other staff interviewed did not hear any residents complained that their phone jack was working in the past. There was not sufficient evidence to support this allegation.
Allegation #2 - Facility did not provide resident internet access resulting in extra charges. LPA interviewed the Administrator and 4 Staff who indicated that the residents’ rooms are equipped with a phone jack. They stated residents are aware any extra items such as a phone line, cable, and internet services are not part of a resident’s monthly rate. The residents are responsible for installing and paying for extra services. LPA interviewed 7 Residents and all but one stated that they are aware the facility does not provide internet and they pay for that service themselves. LPA reviewed the Admission Agreement for R1 and it does not state internet access is included in the basic monthly rate.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Celia Garcia. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights were provided. |