1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | was the one who had asked staff for a letter of eviction.
Interview with Staff who stated that R 1 never discussed a service dog. Stated that the facility did not issue any eviction notice to R1.
Also stated that there was never a mention of eviction to R1.
Based on LPA's observations, record review and interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
In regards to the allegation Staff threatened resident, based on interviews conducted and information gathered staff interviewed stated that at admission a service dog was never discussed. Stated that the dog was brought in without the facility knowing 6 days later.
Stated that In House rules no pets.
Staff stated they offered reduced rent to help house dog elsewhere and after many efforts told R1 they would have to call police if not removed.
Documentation form Assisted Living Waiver for R 1 dated 02/24/2022 have no mention of a service dog.
Staff stated that since 09/14/2022 R 1 had been told no pets allowed.
Assessment tool by Home Health agency dated 02/28/2022 has no mention of service dog.
Physician's Report dated 10/11/2022 has no mention of a service dog to provide assistance.
Interview with R1 who stated he felt harassed because facility asked him numerous times to remove dog.
Did confirm facility did offer reduced rent to help him out .
It should be noted police were never called.
Based on LPA's observations, record review and interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
|