1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for resident. It is alleged that resident (R1) threatened to kill resident (R2) on two occasions. The second incident occurred on 12/1/2022 in the dining room with witnesses present. It is also alleged that staff were made aware of the incident, but the issue was not addressed nor actions were taken by Administration to ensure the resident's safety. Based on interviews conducted, residents (R1 & R2) shared a room and had an argument because R2 borrowed R1's socks without permission. Therefore, R1 got very upset and threatened to punch R2. Resident (R1) stated that on several occasions R2 talked in a vulgar way about facility staff, and it got the resident upset. When the sock incident occurred R2 accused R1 of being ungrateful with it's past assistance with getting dressed. The residents had two verbal arguments, one was in the dining room during breakfast time. According to resident witness (R3), R1 verbally attacked R2 by saying it was going to kill the resident. Resident (R1) denied threatening to kill R2, but did state it threatened to punch R2's face. Due to R1's physical disability and mobility issues, it is unlikely R1 could harm R2.
Upon knowledge of the verbal confrontation incident that occurred in the dining room involving residents (R1 & R2), the Assistant Administrator moved resident (R2) out of the shared room the same day. No further incidents have occurred. The physical plant inspection of the facility did not reveal any environment safety issues. A total of nine (9) residents were interviewed. Two (2) out of nine (9) residents stated they do not feel safe at the facility. All staff interviewed stated the facility provides residents a safe environment. Staff stated there have been no safety concerns reported by residents. The main entrance door is locked at 8 pm and any resident that returns to the facility after 8PM must be buzzed in through the front entrance. All the exit doors were inspected and are operational.
Based on interviews conducted the investigation revealed that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Celia Garcia. A copy of the report was issued. |