1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following…Regarding the allegation: Staff mishandled resident's medication. “It’s being alleged that the facility staff are providing resident(s) with medication that is moist.” LPA interviewed 4 out of 37 staff in total. 0 out of 4 confirmed the allegation. All staff interviewed denied the allegation unanimously. S2 states, “I don’t see how that’s possible because we pop the meds in the resident’s room, and no one have ever said anything about that.” S3 states, “I’m not sure how that can happen because the meds are in bubble packs and some are in bottles, but they are never saturated.” During interviews with residents, LPA interviewed 9 out of 91 residents in total. 1 out of 9 confirmed the allegation. 1 resident stated, on 3 occasions water ended up in the medication cup used to distribute meds. They are unsure how that happened. All other residents interviewed denied the allegations. Citing, they have not experienced their medication being mishandled.
Regarding the allegation: Staff failed to meet resident's hygiene needs. “It’s being alleged that the facility is not providing full support with activities of daily living such as bathing.” 0 out of 4 staff confirmed the allegation. All staff interviewed denied the allegation unanimously. During interviews with residents, 1 out of 9 confirmed the allegation. All other residents interviewed, specifically the residents that need support with activities of daily living, denied the allegation. R7 states, “I have no issues with my hygiene needs being met.” R8 states, “They do a very good job with that.”
During an inspection, LPA observed the room where medication is held. LPA observed medication in a “med cart.” LPA did not observe any medication that was saturated due to being wet. LPA did not observe any leaks in the room or inside the medication cart.
Based on LPA’s observation, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given. |