1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On today's visit 7/31/22, visit consisted of the following: LPA collected copies of staff and resident roster. LPA interviewed Residents #3-#11 (R3-R11), and LPA interviewed staff Assistant Administrator Nilda Mercado (Staff #2- S2) and interviewed Staff #3-Staff #7, (S3-S7). LPA attempted to interview Staff #8 and #9 via telephonically. LPA collected staff documentation on :Statement Acknowledging Requirement to Report Suspected Abuse of Dependent Adults and Elders, Harassment Policy Acknowledgment, Elderly Dependent Abuse Statement, Certificate of Elder Abuse and Certificate of Preventing, Recognizing, and Reporting Abuse.
Regarding Allegation: Resident was sexually abused while in care. Based on investigation the following was revealed. Interviews with S1-S7 revealed all staff denied the above allegation stating resident(s) are not sexually abused while in care and have not sexually abused a resident in care. Interviews with residents, R3-R11 revealed residents are aware what sexual abuse is and have not been sexually abused in care or know of residents who have been sexually abused while in care. LPA Calderon reviewed staff documentation's on sexual abuse Acknowledgment and Training. All staff have documentation's signed on Statement Acknowledging Requirement to Report Suspected Abuse of Dependent Adults and Elders. However, the investigation did not reveal residents or R1 was sexually abused while in care, there is no evidence to support the above allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6, Chapter 8.
Based on LPA's observations, record review and interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. |