1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 7/31/23 LPA Calderon visit consisted of: LPA collected resident and staff roster and attempt to interview R1. LPA observed linen closet and hygiene supplies in Room 1 (Conference Room).
Regarding Allegation: Resident was left in a soiled diaper for a long period of time. During LPA’s visit the following was revealed: During interviews with Staff, S1-S6 all denied the above allegation that residents are attended to, get incontinent care and are not left soiled for a long period of time. All staff stated for incontinent residents’ staff do rounds every 2 hours or as needed to assist residents with toileting needs or other activity of daily living needs a resident may have. Interviews with residents: R2, R3, R6 and R7 are unaware if other residents are left in soil for a long period of time. R2, R3 and R6 stated they are checked by staff, staff assist with changing adult briefs and are not in soiled diapers for a long period of time. LPA attempt to interview R1 on 11/1/22 and 7/31/23 and was not successful. R7 interview revealed they do not get incontinent care and could not relate to above allegation. LPA Calderon reviewed documentation for R1 who is receiving Home Health Services. Unusual Incident Report for incident occurring on 10/21/22 for R1 states R1 was not allowing assistance from facility and was hospitalized for not being compliant with receiving care. The investigation did not reveal resident(s) being left in soiled diapers for a long period of time. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6 Chapter 8.
Regarding Allegation: Facility ignored resident. During LPA’s visit the following was revealed: During interviews with Staff, S1-S6 all denied ignoring resident(s) that staff have not personally ignored any residents including R1 and have not witnessed resident(s) being ignored. S3,S4 and S6 stated staff preform their duties and check in on resident(s). Interviews with residents, R2,R3,R6 and R7 denied the above allegation stating they are not ignored by facility and staff interact with residents to assist with each residents needs. LPA attempt to interview R1 on 11/1/22 and 7/31/23 and was not successful. On 11/1/22 LPA observed R1’s door having a sign stating No Housekeeping. LPA reviewed UIR documentation for R1 stating R1 was transferred to the hospital for assistance when R1 did not allow facility to assist with care. The investigation did not reveal that facility ignore resident(s). Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6 Chapter 8.
Regarding Allegation: Resident's hygiene needs are not being met. During LPA’s visit the following was revealed: Interviews with staff, S1-S6 denied above allegation and stated residents hygiene needs are being met, staff do rounds to residents rooms every 2 hours, staff assist with incontinent care, hygiene needs like showering and dressing residents. S1 stated R1 doesn’t allow caregivers to go inside R1’s room and assist R1, it is only when R1 wants to and will ask for assistance. S2 stated R1 wants specific caregivers to assist R1’s needs and refuses care from certain staff and R1 has a sign on room door stating not allowing housekeepers to go in their room. LPA observed R1’s door having a sign stating:No Housekeeping. LPA Calderon reviewed documentation for R1, doctor ordered Home Health Services. Unusual Incident Report for incident occurring on 10/21/22 for R1 states R1 was not allowing assistance from facility and was hospitalized for not being compliant with receiving care. LPA observed sufficient linen and hygiene supplies. The investigation did not reveal resident's hygienes needs are not being met.Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6 Chapter 8.
Based on LPA's observations, record review and interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
|