1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | the following: Individual Program Plan (IPP), Physical Exam dated 7/19/21 and Medical Visit Information dates 8/16/21, 8/17/21 and 8/18/21. LPA also collected copies of Staff and Client Rosters. LPA observed four (4) clients in care during visit: One client was in the living room and three (3) clients were in the family room.
Investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation, Staff inappropriately handled resident in care, it is alleged that facility staff pushed client. Interview with Administrator Nicolas revealed that staff have not inappropriately handled any client in care. She stated that none of her staff have pushed any facility client. She stated that facility staff treat all clients with dignity and respect. Interviews conducted with S1-3 revealed that they have never inappropriately handled or pushed any facility client. S1-3 stated that they treat all clients with dignity and respect. Administrator and S1 stated that C1 had recently exhibited a change in condition and also began fabricating stories. Interviews conducted with C3-4 revealed that they like living at the facility and stated that facility staff have not pushed them. LPA attempted to interview C1-2 but was unable to obtain relevant information. LPA additionally interviewed placement agency personnel and information obtained from them did not reveal any supportive evidence for the allegation. LPA observed four (4) clients in care during the visit and observed clients to appear calm and participating in individualized activities. LPA reviewed C1's IPP which revealed that client has a history of property destruction and fabricating incidents. LPA observed interactions between staff and clients and did not observe anything of concern and also observed staff tending to clients needs. Based on interviews conducted with facility administrator/ staff, facility clients, placement agency personnel, LPAs observations and review of documents there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held. A copy of the report was provided to Administrator Rosario Nicolas. |