1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (6) of (6) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (10) of (10) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews do not show that R1 required a higher level of care not being provided by the assisted living portion of the facility. As a continuing care retirement community, there is a skilled nursing portion for residents to move into when needed. According to interviews and file review, it has not been determined that R1 is in need of moving to that portion at the moment. R2 is the power of attorney of health care decisions for R1 and also stated that R1 is not in need of being moved to the skilled nursing portion. R2 is also R1's spouse and shares the same room. Interviews with R1 and R2 did not show that the staff are not meeting R1's needs or that clothes are not fitting. Based on interviews, files reviewed, and observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In regards to the allegation "Staff are not ensuring that resident is eating properly" it was alleged that R1 is not eating properly in the facility. (6) of (6) Staff interviews denied the allegation. (10) of (10) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews show that R1 is provided breakfast, lunch and dinner daily to their room. Interviews with staff also show that R1 is provided additional calorie dense drinks between meals. Interviews did show that R1 will at times not want to eat and will need reminders and encouragement. File review does show that the staff are to encourage R1 to eat their meals, are to cut up food for R1, and to provide between meal nourishment. Interviews with R2 stated that the facility staff are doing those things for R1. Staff interviews also stated that those things are being done for R1. LPA observed R1 receive in between meal nourishment as well as lunch during the time of this visit. Based on interviews, files reviewed, and observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided. |