1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from 9099)
LPA interviewed four staff (4) and four (4) of four (4) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed ten (10) residents and nine (9) of ten (10) were not able to corroborate the allegation.
S1 stated that facility has always includes residents in their care planning. S1 stated resident brought this issue to S1 in November 2024 and told S1 that R1 did not want to take the medication and S1 told resident that R1 has right to refuse any medication and S2 called R1 MD to discontinue the medication.
LPA interviewed R1 and R1 stated R1 does not recall specific details, but stated that R1 was given a psychotropic medication, that S2 identified as Amitriptyline, since 2022 that R1 never agreed to. R1 stated R1 did not recall the medication name but R1 stated that it is on a list in R1 file. R1 stated that when R1 started getting the medication back in 2022, R1 asked S2 what the medication was for and was told it was for ulcers and stomach pain. R1 stated R1 did not have ulcers. R1 stated to LPA that R1 does not have clear recollection of details and continued to take the medication until one day R1 decided to take R1 list of medications to a local pharmacy and was told what Amitriptyline was for. R1 asked S1 for it to be discontinued and it was discontinued by his physician. R1 was inconsistent in R1 statements and could not provide any evidence to support the allegation that staff lied to R1.
S2 stated R1 was already prescribed Amitriptyline medication before S1 even began work at facility which was three years ago. S2 denied ever telling R1 that Amitriptyline was for pain and ulcers. S2 stated S2 told R1 that Amitriptyline was for depression. S3 denied ever telling R1 anything about Amitriptyline. S3 stated it was never discussed with resident because resident did not bring it up to S3. There is no evidence that staff lied to resident.
Based on interviews, most residents stated they participate in their care plan and know what medications they take and the reason they take them. There is insufficient evidence to substantiate this allegation.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and review of client file, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided. |