1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews conducted with clients (C1–C11) and staff (S1–S6) revealed that 1 out of 11 clients (C1) reported the relationship existed. Three staff reported hearing from (C1) or other staff that a relationship existed; however, no staff reported directly observing or independently confirming the relationship between both parties. The remaining 10 clients denied knowledge of the relationship. (W1), former staff, declined to provide a statement or interview, which limits corroboration of the allegation and leaves only one direct reporting source without independent verification. Records reviewed included a prior facility investigation in which both parties denied the relationship. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance standard. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff financially abused a client,” it was alleged that staff used clients’ funds for personal use. Interviews conducted with clients (C1–C11) and staff (S1–S6) revealed that 0 out of 11 clients and 0 out of 6 staff denied the allegation. One Staff (S3) acknowledged a prior incident in which they assisted Client (C2) with a food purchase and later reimbursed the client. Records reviewed and documented by (S1) indicated that this incident was addressed and resolved by the facility. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance standard. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not safeguard resident’s medication,” it was alleged that medications were left with residents and not properly supervised. Interviews conducted with clients (C1–C11) and staff (S1–S6) indicated that 0 out of 11 clients reported medications being left in rooms, while 2 out of 6 staff reported concerns regarding medications being left with residents or found in rooms, and the remaining 4 staff denied such practices. Observations revealed no medications left in resident rooms during the visit. Records reviewed, including the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for (C1), were explained by (S5) as accurate and did not indicate discrepancies in administration. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance standard. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator Assistant. |