1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed the administrator, staff, and clients. The administrator acknowledged a person in a black car has driven by at times and is a possible friend of a client. However, he has not witnessed any type of transaction with other clients nor has there been any reports of illegal activities with that person. Other staff at the facility have not seen this car or any activities occurring during the morning hours. Staff stated they monitor clients during their shifts.
Administrator informed LPA they have hired private securities to help monitor the grounds in addition to his own staff starting a few months ago. There is 24 hour coverage, 7 days a week and there is no gap in supervision. LPA interviewed 2 private security guards who were present during the visit. They both stated they work a 12 hour shift to monitor the facility and conduct room checks every hour. They will leave when the next guard arrives. They have not seen any black car appear during their shifts nor observed clients going out to a certain car. LPA interviewed a total of 5 clients. They stated there is a security guard on the premises who patrols the area. They have not witnessed anybody going outside to a car and engaging in illegal activities. Based on the information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate this allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights were provided.
|