1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Due to staff neglect resident developed a pressure injury while in care.
It is alleged that resident 1 (R1) developed a pressure injury while in care of the facility due to the staff’s neglect. R1 was admitted to the facility on 9/11/2021. A review of her service assessment form, completed on 9/04/2021 shows resident was independent in mobility and activities of daily living. After R1’s 3/22/2022 hospitalization, records show that R1 was admitted to St. Liz Hospice Care on 4/8/2022. R1’s initial hospice assessment noted that R1 had poor skin turgor and her skin was easily prone to bruising and tearing. It was also noted that due to R1’s limited mobility she was a high risk for skin breakdown and that primary caregivers were instructed to turn and reposition R1 every 2 hours and to provide adequate skin care. As of 4/8/2022 there was a physician’s order by the hospice for skin care maintenance to R1’s buttocks area to prevent skin breakdown and redness. A review of facility records shows that on 5/10/2022 an open sore was seen on R1’s buttocks and both hospice and family were informed. Per W1, R1 was diagnosed with a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the sacral coccyx area on 5/12/2022, which W1 described as redness. LPM Cifuentes interviewed Staff S1-S5 and attempted to interview S6. S6 was no longer employed by the facility and could not be contacted for an interview. LPM asked staff if resident was repositioned every two hours as stipulated in the hospice care plan. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 answered yes. LPM also asked staff who handled R1's wound care, and 5 out of 5 staff inteviewed stated the facility does not handle wound care, that only a nurse can do that. S1 added during their interview that hospice nurses handled the wound care for R1 and that R1 had an alternating pressure mattress. S2 stated during the interview that the facility does not keep logs regarding the repositioning of residents. LPM noted that notes from St. Liz Hospice account for the wound care provided to R1 by hospice nursing staff
Based on interviews, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated.
There were no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Corina Kahl and redelivered to Heather Argueta. |