1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During an Interview with the Administrator (A#1), she stated that the people in charge of the billing at the facility are the Business Office Manager (S#1), the Business Office Assistant (S#2), and me. Also, (A#1) stated that the facility has never overcharged a resident while in care. In addition, (A#1) noted the following: (R#1) is in the Medical and SSI program, and at the beginning of every year, most residents get an increase in income from SSI. When the residents receive an increase from SSI, we increased the board rate, and that was the charges regarding (R#1). The two-month increase was from January and February of 2022 and is only the increase amount. We have cleared the amount of (R#1)’ s balance.
During interviews with Residents (R#1-R#10), 10 out of 10 stated that they do not handle their finances directly; a family member or legal representative does it. Also, 10 out of 10 stated that the facility has never overcharged them.
During interviews with staff (S#1-S#10), 9 out of 10 stated that the person(s) who handles the billing for the residents at the facility is (S#1), (S#2), and (A#1). Also, 9 out of 10 stated they had never known or heard about the facility overcharging residents.
During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegations.
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8).
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Nina Rejuso/LVN.
|