1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued LIC9099-C page 3
S1-S2 stated R1 was not off his medications for eight months. S1-S2 stated R1 refused to take his shots for about three (3) to four (4) months. S1-S2 stated when R1 missed his medications they will contact the physician, R1's conservatory which is his mother, and self-report the incident to Community Care Licensing and all the appropriate agencies. S1-S2 stated R1's mother took R1 to the hospital because he refuses to take his shots. S1-S2 stated R1's mother tried to convince R1 to take his shots and he refuses to do so. S1-S2 stated R1's medical records are documented and that he refuses to take his medication according to his physician's direction. S1-S2 stated R1 did not have any injuries or bruises on his left arm and it was not red. S1-S2 stated nor did R1 have a scrape on his ankle. Licensee Mr. Goodson stated he never told anyone we have people like R1, and we have to use a taser on them is a false statement. S1-S2 stated R1 is no longer residing at the facility. S1-S2 stated S3 is deceased but it had nothing to do with R1 punching S3 in the face causing injuries and bruises to the right side of her face. R2-R6 stated they were happy living at the facility, their care needs are being met, and the staff treats them with dignity and respect. R2-R6 stated they had no problems. S1-S2 and R2-R6 stated they never witnessed staff make inappropriate comments toward residents, nor have they observed or witnessed staff using an inappropriate form of punishment to residents. S1 stated the complainant does handle the facility's financial records and doesn't knows anything about his staff's payroll. S1 stated the facility's financial plan ensures the resources necessary to meet the operating costs for the care and supervision of residents. S1-S2 and R2-R6 all denied the allegations.
Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
There were no deficiencies cited.
Exit interview conducted. |