1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews with (R1-R9) all reported that themselves have not encountered any personal property items missing and that the staff is professional and trustworthy. Interviews conducted with staff #1-#3 (S1-S3) claims they had no knowledge of resident's personal belongings were not being safeguarded. (S1-S3) states staff abides by the house rules and will announce their presence before entering a resident room. (S1-S3) reported they have often observed (R1’s) with an open door unattended and will shut the door for the resident when she is not in her room. (S1-S3) verified staff have all completed various mandatory training courses including subject on Ethics.
Based on information gathered, an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis of (R-1)'s service records, and interviews conducted, the Department found no evidence to support the allegation listed on this complaint report.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging " Resident's belongings are not being safeguarded in their room while in care.". We have found that the complaint is unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint.
Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided to Amalia Equivias.
|