1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | and began patting her back to relax C1. Witnesses stated that this had been the patten of behavior during rest time for the three days that C1 had been in the class and was considered normal behavior for a new day care child adjusting to a new schedule. S2 stated that there was nothing unusual about C1’s behavior that warranted a conversation with mom. Site Supervisor Rosalia Nava stated that when mother presented her concerns of a staff hitting her child, there were no concerns brought to her and immediately contacted S1 and requested S1 to have a conversation with mom to work through the details of C1’s day. A Parent conference was held, a request was made for the child to placed in a different classroom, but there was no space. Parent removed child from facility. Through the course of this complaint parent interviews were conducted, and there were no corroborating statements of day care children’s personal rights being violated at the facility. There were no corroborating statements of staff not communicating with parents. Parent 2(P2) stated that her child had difficulty adjusting, but is doing very well in the class now. P3 stated that his son doesn't nap, but he knows it's the quiet time. P5 stated that her child has been at the school for two years, and she loves the staff, and how they treat her baby.
The facility administration conducted an internal investigation consisting of multiple interviews, as well as staff training to ensure continued supervision, positive support of the rights of children, and communication with parents. The facility administration reported the incident noted in this complaint as an Unusual Incident on 1/22/2026. Report was submitted timely.
Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations there is not a preponderance of evidence to support the allegations of ‘staff hit a day care child or staff did not report incident(s) to the parent.’ Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED which means there is not a preponderance of evidence to support whether the incident did or did not occur.
Based on today’s inspection there will be no deficiencies cited in accordance with California Title 22 Regulations.
A Notice of Site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to post will result in a civil penalty of $100.
Report was reviewed with Site Supervisor Rosalia Nava. A Copy of the report and appeal rights was given to Site Supervisor Rosalia Nava.
(Report Ends Here 2 of 2 Pages)
|