1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with the staff, one staff disclosed that there is a child that has visited the facility on random occasions, but is only here for a short period of time and never daily. Per C1 they disclosed a baby’s name (Child #4(C4)) who was not present at this time. C1 pointed to the house next door and stated that they live there, and came to the facility to play. C2 nodded while saying yes. C3 did not make any disclosures regarding the allegation.
Per Licensee’s interview, she disclosed that she occasionally accepts the neighbor’s child(C4) in her facility for a couple of hours but only when she is under her licensed capacity. Licensee stated that she is aware of licensing requirements and should have had documentation for this child. Licensee stated she does not take payment for the child as she only accepts the child to come for minimal hours at a time and it is never daily.
LPAs obtained children’s roster and observed attendance sheets and did not observe C4 in the records.
Based on interviews, observations and disclosures made during the department investigation, the preponderance of evidence and the standard has been met, therefore, the allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22 Division & Chapter), are being cited on the attached deficiencies page LIC 9099-D. These incidents pose a potential risk to the Health and Safety of the children in care.
Exit interview was conducted with Irma Canal, Licensee.
Appeal rights were provided.
The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) – must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100. |