1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith arrived unannounced for a Case Management – Deficiencies visit due to deficiencies observed during the investigation of complaint control # 29-AS-20211123163312.
During the initial visit conducted on 2/25/2022, the LPA was let into the property by staff Rogelia Macapia (S1). During that visit, S1 first claimed that they had been working at the facility two weeks prior to the LPA's visit, but later in the visit, S1 claimed it was their first day working at the location. S1 confirmed that they were also living in the facility. Former Administrator Naira Paroyan also made claims that it was S1's first day at the facility. However, after conducting an in depth file review, it was confirmed that S1 was working at the facility at least since January 2022, as S1 was interviewed by Investigator Dennis Douglas on 1/28/2022, whom was conducting interviews during the investigation of complaint control # 29-AS-20211112142407. At that time, S1 had claimed that it was their ‘first day’ working at the facility.
The facility did not have any staffing records on file. At this time, additional civil penalties will be assessed due to lack of criminal record clearance, as S1 was never associated to the facility. The licensee was initially cited for a penalty of $100, as S1 claimed to had only worked one day as of 2/25/2022.
Licensee has been cited for failure to ensure that persons worked at this facility with appropriate criminal record clearance on the following dates 2/25/2022, 11/8/2021, 11/4/2021, 8/25/2021. The licensee will be assessed an additional fourteen (14 days) as S1 initially noted that they had been in the facility for two weeks.
Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted, today's reports and appeal rights were provided. Civil penalties issued.
|