1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099
On 12/20/2023, 01/10/2024 and 01/29/2024, LPA attempted to interview Staff #2 (S2), but was unsuccessful. On 01/29/2024, LPA interviewed the responsible party of Resident #1(R1). On 01/10/2024, 01/29/2024 and 02/06/2024, LPA attempted to interview the responsible party of Resident #2 (R2) but, was unsuccessful. LPA was unable to contact the reporting party to obtain any additional information.
It was reported that staff sexually assaulted a resident while in care, as it was alleged that S1 touched R1 in their pelvic area with malicious intent. Interviews conducted and records review revealed that Memory Care Director at the time of the complaint, Ivette Rios, was informed that S1 checked the diaper by pressing the back of their hand on the pelvic area of R1 without a glove. According to Rios, S1, first received approval from R1 before proceeding to check their diaper. R1’s significant other was also in the room along with S2, who S1 was shadowing at that time. S1 did not change the diaper of R1. Rios continued to state, staff are instructed to use gloves when providing incontinent care to residents, although S1 did not follow protocol of using gloves, Rios did not find any evidence of malicious intent from S1 when as they provided incontinent service to R1. Interviews conducted with ten (10) staff revealed that all ten (10) staff have not observed any staff conduct any lewd acts with any residents in care and all did not express any potential or immediate concerns of any other staff conducting any lewd acts to residents at this time. LPA’s interview with five (5) families/responsible parties of residents in care revealed that all five (5) did not express any potential or immediate concerns for staff servicing the residents at this time. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff sexually assaulted resident while in care” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
It was reported that staff handled resident in a rough manner, as it was alleged that S1 was involved in a physical altercation with Resident #2 (R2). Interviews conducted with eleven (11) staff revealed that all eleven (11) staff have never observed S1 involved in a physical altercation with R2 or be physically aggressive with any resident in care. LPA’s interview with five (5) families/responsible parties of residents in care revealed that all five (5) did not express any potential or immediate concerns for staff servicing the residents at this time. |