1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that facility staff did not notify R1’s authorized representative of change in condition. It was further reported that the facility did not inform the authorized representative that R1 had a pressure injury, was not eating, had swallowing difficulties and had lost weight. Information gathered during the course of the investigation reflected that R1 was initially admitted to the Assisted Living (AL) portion of the facility on 09/05/2022. However, due to R1’s decline facility conducted a reappraisal on 10/25/2022 and it was determined that R1 needed a high level of care and would be better suited in Memory Care (MC). Additionally, records and interviews further reflected that the facility also conducted a reappraisal on 09/20/2022 due to R1’s decline. Interviews conducted also reflected that R1’s Power of Attorney (POA)/Responsible Party (RP), was aware of R1’s decline and was notified of the pressure injury. Moreover, it was revealed that the facility attempted to discuss the reappraisals with R1’s authorized representative however, was unable due to the authorized representative rescheduling the meetings. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “staff did not notify R1’s authorized representative of change in condition” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
It was alleged that the facility staff did not meet resident’s oral hygiene needs, as it was alleged that staff neglected to assist R1 with brushing their teeth resulting in poor oral hygiene. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed that upon admittance R1 did not need assistance with brushing their teeth. However, as R1’s health declined R1 needed assistance with brushing R1’s teeth. Per interviews with staff, staff would assist R1 with brushing their teeth even though, R1 would sometimes refuse. Information also obtained during the course of the investigation reflected that during admission to the facility R1’s teeth were already slow declining. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “facility staff did not meet resident’s oral hygiene needs” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Exit interview conducted/No citations issued/ A copy of Report provided. |