1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On the allegation, Licensee did not report changes made to the plan of operation which effect the services to clients – the DHCS annual review confirmed that the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that they provide services which emphasize the development of vocational skills and linkages to services offering employment or job placement. Discrepancies were found in the current policy and procedures used by facility from the initial plan of operation submit. Also, changes in the administration were made without obtaining prior approval. Based on information obtained from credible witness and records review there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegations of is deemed substantiated at this time.
On the allegation of Incomplete client records, during the DHCS annual review, facility was out of compliance with this section based on a review of three (3) client records. The admission agreement in three (3) client record(s) (Client #1, #2, #3) reviewed did not contain documented evidence that it was signed on entry by the client or an authorized representative and program representative; two (2) client record(s) (client#2 and #3) written assessments was not completed on admission. The treatment/ rehabilitation plan in one (1) open client records (client #3) did not contain documented evidence of length of stay needed to accomplish identified goals and methods to evaluate achievement of goals. Discharge summary for two (2) client(s) for (client #4 and client #5) did not contain documented evidence of services provided, goals accomplished, reason and plan for discharge and referral for follow-up plans. The discharge summary for two (2) client(s) for Client #4 and Client #5 did not contain documented evidence that it was prepared with the client. Based on information obtained and records review there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegations of is deemed substantiated at this time.
On the allegation Direct care staff do not meet the minimum qualifications required – during the DHCS annual review on 2/25/25, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that the staff preparing the admission assessments had received training in the development of the preparation of these documents. Ohana Recovery Center was out of compliance based on a review of in-service training records. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that the staff preparing the treatment/rehabilitation plans had received training in the development of the preparation of these documents. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that the staff preparing the discharge summary had received training in the development of the preparation of these documents. Ohana Recovery Center was out of compliance based on a review of personnel records. Eight (8) personnel records for Staff #1-8 did not contain documented evidence that the employee(s) had one (1) year of full-time experience, or its part-time equivalent. |