1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The licensee provides daycare, drop off and pick up children from the nearby school. Per reporting party, on 11/13/25, the parent brought child #1 (C1) to the licensee home, so licensee could take C1 to school. Parent#1 (P1) began to buckle C1 into the car seat with the chest belt but was unable to properly secure C1’s leg belt. The licensee told P1 to leave the belt like that because they were late; the licensee drove off. P1 did not see the licensee secure the child in the car seat after they were told to leave it.
Per staff #1 (S1), The licensee provides daycare and drop off and pick up children from the nearby school. The licensee drives a total of 4 children to school on most mornings starting at 7:30 am. Per S1 and Child #2 (C2) the children must secure their seat belts, or they do not drive off. Per S1 on the first day C1 was completely buckled into the car seat.
LPA observed the vehicle, took photos and inspected the car seat and found that the chest belt as well as the leg belt was in good working condition. There was no collaborating evidence to prove the child was not properly restrained.
Based upon observations and evidence obtained during this investigation, the allegation Licensee did not secure daycare child in an appropriate restraint system in the vehicle, have been determined unsubstantiated. A finding that a complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee Leticia Flores. Notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
|